Gothic Fiction / New Contemporary Gothic

Appetite of the Walls

Combining Edgar Allan Poe + Silvia Moreno-Garcia | House of Leaves + White is for Witching

4.5 10 reviews 13 min read 3,349 words
Start Reading · 13 min

Synopsis


An architect renovating her husband's family house in Guanajuato finds the interior measurements growing inward and begins eating the mineral deposits that bloom on the walls, unable to locate the moment the house stopped being a project and became a hunger.

Poe's obsessive, clause-heavy interiority and confined-space dread meet Moreno-Garcia's postcolonial specificity and material gothic, structured through House of Leaves' spatial impossibility mediated by unreliable documentation, with White is for Witching's pica and house-as-consuming- entity providing the thematic core of belonging-as-digestion.

Behind the Story


A discussion between Edgar Allan Poe and Silvia Moreno-Garcia

The house had been converted into a cafe, which was part of the problem. Some colonial-era building in a neighborhood that couldn't decide whether it was being renovated or devoured — scaffolding on one side, fresh paint on the other, the roof tiles old enough to crumble if you breathed on them. Moreno-Garcia had chosen it. Poe had arrived first, which surprised me. He was sitting in the courtyard, in the shade of a jacaranda that had pushed its roots through the tile floor, and he was staring…

Read the full discussion

The Formula


Author A Edgar Allan Poe
  • Accumulative, clause-heavy sentences that pile dread through rhythm and repetition
  • Obsessive cataloguing of sensory detail as failed rationalization
  • Confined-space psychology — the narrator trapped inside the architecture of her own colonized perception
Author B Silvia Moreno-Garcia
  • The house grounded in specific Mexican colonial architecture — tezontle, tienda de raya, hacienda economy
  • Colonial violence as structural haunting, not supernatural event
  • Doña Rosalba's matter-of-fact history as the gothic of systemic repetition
Work X House of Leaves
  • Spatial impossibility experienced only through Irene's documentation — measurements mediated, never shown directly
  • The hidden room that resists cartography, growing through the gaps in the record
  • The notebook as unreliable document collaborating with the house's geometry
Work Y White is for Witching
  • Pica as the body enacting architectural appetite — the house feeding Irene itself
  • Efflorescence as the material of consumption and belonging
  • The house's selectivity — outsiders consumed, made part of its body

Reader Reviews


4.5 10 reviews
Valentina Rojas

The tienda de raya is the key that unlocks this entire story. Dona Rosalba's monologue -- 'the debt made leaving irrational. The house provided. It fed them' -- is not exposition; it is the thesis of a story that understands colonial extraction as an ongoing metabolic process, not a historical event with a terminus. The pica functions brilliantly here: Irene's body enacts the logic of the hacienda economy, consuming the house that is consuming her, a closed circuit of belonging-as-debt. That the notebook transitions from investigation to ledger -- 'a record not of the house's deviations but of its claims, entered faithfully, without protest, like the accounts in a tienda de raya' -- is structurally devastating. This is Gothic fiction that knows the real haunting is systemic.

58 found this helpful

Leonard Fry

The architectural uncanny here is handled with unusual sophistication. The Leica DISTO as mediating instrument -- measurements that cannot be trusted but also cannot be ignored, the precision of the device making the impossibility more rather than less disturbing -- positions the story in productive tension between empiricism and spatial horror. The notebook's formal degradation from annotated cross-referenced documentation to bare columns of numbers to the final declarative ('All measurements confirmed. Structure sound') maps the protagonist's absorption into the house's logic with devastating precision. The Rosalba section is the necessary hinge: without her testimony the colonial metaphor would remain atmospheric rather than structural, and it is the structural reading that makes this story exceptional. The tienda de raya parallel elevates the notebook-as-ledger from clever device to indictment.

48 found this helpful

Sunita Rao

I keep thinking about the moment where Irene's thought begins -- 'she should' -- and the verb arrives but the object doesn't. That is the most frightening thing I've read in months. Not a jump scare, not a monster, just the quiet disappearance of the will to leave, described with such precision that you feel it happening to you as you read. The Guanajuato setting is gorgeous and specific, the colonial history woven in without ever feeling like a lecture. And Rosalba telling Irene 'the belonging is digestion' -- that line will stay with me. This is a story about how places own people, and it earns every word of its dread.

42 found this helpful

Grace Alderman

The procedural detail here is excellent and earns the story's credibility. The Leica DISTO rated to plus-or-minus 1.5mm, the Moleskine in the back pocket of work jeans, the cadastral survey from 1847 versus the family's 1920s hand-drawn plans -- these are the details of someone who understands that documentation is never neutral. The notebook's transformation from investigative record to bare ledger is the most chilling element for me, more so than the pica or the expanding rooms. I have spent my career watching records become instruments of the institutions they were meant to document. 'All measurements confirmed. Structure sound' is exactly how a compromised archive reads: perfectly organized, perfectly useless.

35 found this helpful

Diane Osei

The moment Rosalba says 'who held him under?' about the doctors calling it kidney failure -- that is the kind of line that makes you set a book down and stare at the wall. Which is an uncomfortable thing to do after reading this particular story. What gets me is how the pica never reads as metaphor while you're inside Irene's perspective. She eats the wall dust the way she eats sunflower seeds, absently, and the normalization is where the real damage lives. The ending refuses rescue, refuses revelation, refuses everything except the protagonist's completed absorption. I have read a lot of contemporary Gothic and very little of it achieves this — the horror that arrives not through shock but through the quiet disappearance of resistance. Properly devastating.

30 found this helpful

Tomasz Baran

A story that understands the Gothic as a literature of occupation -- of bodies by houses, of labor by debt, of consciousness by appetite. The prose achieves something rare: those accumulative, clause-heavy sentences that pile qualification upon qualification enact the same accretion the house performs on its walls. The taste of efflorescence evolving from 'salt and chalk' to something 'spatial' is a remarkable metaphor for the way colonial architecture literalizes power -- the building becomes edible, which is to say, it becomes total. I am uncertain the story needed Sebastian at all; his indifference, while thematically functional, feels schematic compared to the complexity of Irene's dissolution. But the final line -- that clinical declaration of structural soundness from a narrator who has been structurally consumed -- is masterful.

28 found this helpful

Rachel Nguyen-Torres

Oh this one is going to WRECK my book club. The scene where Irene lies down on the dirt floor and it shapes itself to her -- 'a surface that had been waiting to receive her specific weight, her particular outline' -- physically uncomfortable to read. And Sebastian's response to her messages is just a thumbs-up emoji and a photo of his lunch? The real horror! Absolutely recommending this to everyone who loved Mexican Gothic and wanted something even more unsettling.

15 found this helpful

Owen Hargrave

Atmospheric in the best sense -- the house is genuinely unsettling, particularly the hidden room that keeps growing while the measurements pile up. The long sentences do their work; the first paragraph alone made me claustrophobic, and that claustrophobia never quite lifts. The meditation is the menace, I realised by the end. Rosalba's visit is the standout scene, real tension delivered through monologue rather than action, and it recontextualises everything before it. 'Structure sound' as a final line is properly chilling. A slow burn that earns the destination.

4 found this helpful

Javier Montalvo

The Guanajuato details are real -- the tunnels, the subsidence, the tezontle. That's more than most stories bother with. And the tienda de raya section hits because it's not decorative; the whole story is structured around that debt logic. But I'll be honest: the prose style kept me at arm's length. Sentence after sentence piling up clauses when a shorter cut would've drawn more blood. The dread is intellectual, not visceral. Rosalba's monologue is the best part -- blunt, angry, no flourishes. Wanted more of that directness.

4 found this helpful

Felix Ackermann

The writing is undeniably good and the house is creepy, but I kept waiting for the story to turn somewhere unexpected and it never really did. Once you understand that Irene is being consumed by the house -- which is clear fairly early -- the rest is elaboration. Rosalba arriving to explain the history felt like the story pausing to make sure I got the point. The ending works, though. That final notebook entry is the kind of quiet horror that lands harder than any shock would have. I just wish the middle had more surprise in it.

3 found this helpful